Gallery:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Conclusion:
All told, the MP2 and MP3 represent an excellent entry in the ‘budget gamer’ market, which seems to be Evo-G’s target market. There is nothing wrong with them, and a few things done very right. While they innovate little, they provide a reasonably attractive (especially the MP2) design, more than adequate room for mousing around at low sensitivity (which demands Guernica-sized mousepads), with a (probable) modest pricetag – I wasn’t able to find a retail outlet yet carrying the MP-series mousepads, but it’s only a matter of time.
I didn’t address tracking earlier, but I should – if a mouse tracks on a normal pad, there’s every reason it will track as well or better on the Evo-G stuff. Optical mice fail when presented with surfaces of mixed height (carpet) and reflective (mirrors) or transmittive (glass) surfaces, and Evo-G has made none of these mistakes. The texture offers enough bite for ball mice, for those unwilling to give up their vintage Razers (which, coincidentally, should match the MP3 nicely).
