From Western Digital:
The Raptor has EVOLVED!
- WD VelociRaptor™–the fastest SATA drive in the universe!
- Genetically engineered from the high-performance DNA of WD Raptor®
The ultimate drive for performance enthusiasts and high-speed workstations
- 300 GB of high-performance storage
- Unparalleled speed for faster data access
- Reliability designed for the enterprise, built for enthusiasts
Program/Product Lines
- WD VelociRaptor
- Product family –VR150
- Model –WD3000GLFS
Form Factor
- 3.5-inch, 10,000 RPM (2.5-inch HDA, 15mm z-height)
- 2 platters, 4 heads
- Ships mounted in the WD-IcePAK™for placement into 3.5-inch slot
Capacity
- 300 GB
Product Comparison:
WD Raptor EL150
|
WD VelociRaptor VR150
|
|
Features:
|
||
Models & Capacity
|
150 GB , 74 GB, 36 GB
|
300 GB
|
Buffer Size
|
16 MB
|
16 MB
|
Interface
|
SATA 1.5 GB/s
|
SATA 3 GB/s
|
Reliability:
|
||
MTBF
|
1.2M hrs
|
1.4M hrs
|
Warranty
|
5 years
|
5 years
|
Performance:
|
||
Seek Time (Read)
|
4.7 ms
|
4.2 ms
|
Seek Time (Write)
|
5.9 ms
|
4.7 ms
|
Read IOPS (QD=1)
|
124
|
134
|
Sustained Data Rate
|
88 MB/s
|
120 MB/s
|
Environmental:
|
||
Operating Temp Ambient
|
5-55 ambient, 60 max case
|
5-55 ambient, 60 max case
|
Temperature Change Rate
(Op/Non-Op) |
20C / 30C per hour
|
20C / 30C per hour
|
Non-operating Temperature
|
-40 to 70 ambient
|
-40 to 70 ambient
|
Acoustic:
|
||
Idle:
|
29 dBA
|
29 dBA
|
Seek (avg):
|
36 dBA
|
36 dBA
|
Ramp Load/unload
|
N/A
|
2 (sones)
|
lol, be my guest.
…You have the only new model…
🙂
Yes Dan(s). You’ll even notice this uses the old IcePak. They are great drives though!
I wonder if the new ice pack, firmware, etc provide any substantial improvements in performance. Any chance we could compare this one to the new model?
I am suprised about the timing of this review. These drives have been out for quite some time. I have been running a pair of them in RAID 0 for about 6 months with the Win 7 Beta and now the Win 7 RC. The performance and stability is amazing!
This was more of a transfer of the review from our old site. It was actually the old model. We wanted to move it over so that we could reference it in an upcoming review.