![]() |
Need some serious help! (note: big picture)
Ok hey every1 nice boards. First off thank god i found a sane forums all of you seem very kool (i've been parusing the boards earlier today)
Ok here's my problem. I have a pretty good machine, but it does not seem to get all the performance it should. Esp in programs such as 3dMark 03 or 3dMark 05. I relize that some of these programs are graphics card intensive but when i score this low in 3d Mark, i'm starting to wonder what I can do. I'll start by posting my computer specs to the finest degree. (I wont say sound, hard drives, or other perferials. Only the essitentials) AMD Athlon XP 2700 (Running at 2.17 ghz) (barton box came with cpu heat sink) 1.5 gigs of Kingston PC3200 ram (3 dimms) MSI K7N2 Delta-L 400 FSB (supports up to 3 gigs of ram in 3 dimms as well as dual channel) BFG GeForce FX 5500 256 Meg VRAM (I have overclocked it from time to time without much success, it does the overclocking but no real im provements) WIN XP Pro SP 2 Those are all the specs that should be needed. Now moving on I want to know what I can do to boost it's performance. I have read somewhere that I can overclock AMD's easily. However every single time I do overclock anything, when i restart my monitor goes yellow (cpu hang) I can get my PC to go at 2.19 ghz but after that it just CPU hangs. I have also tried overclocking my ram also no luck. Please if there is anything that I can do please let me know. I hope someone can help me get more out of machine. Note: I am buying the ATI Radeon 9800 Pro in the next week Note: Nothing was running when i did the 3d mark 05 My 3d mark 05 score is attached. It's very very sad! :confused: :( |
That score is actually not too bad for a 3DMark 05 score for that class of card. You have to consider that synthetic benchmarks are rarely accurate and that the scoring is seemingly exponential, strongly favoring high end cards.
|
Yea that kind of makes sense, since 05 has all top of the line features and the fx series didn't even have as many features as the 9700 series.. my 9500 got like 1500 in 05 when it was OC'd a bunch
oh and running all that crap while benchmarking doesn't help either.. |
I wasn't running that stuff while i benchmarked. I only get a score of 1,600 on 3d mark 03. Only 3d mark 01 gives me a decent score of 12,000
|
aka direct x 9 stuff which I was referring to
|
any other ideas folks?
|
|
hmm.. that agp aperature size seem a little too high..
|
Quote:
|
This is why I thought its too high: http://www.rojakpot.com/showFreeBOG....ang=0&bogno=32
|
I keep mine at the same size as the video memory
|
Quote:
|
first off, get cpuZ ( www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php ) and see if your memory is running in dual channel mode. if not, pull one of those sticks of memory, most nforce motherboards that only have 3 dimms dont run dual channel when all three are populated... so check your manual on the dual channel config and pull the stick thats in the odd slot (so that you have the 2 in the right slots for dual channel mode....)
then second put your apature size at 256 with that much memory and that card you dont need anything bigger the loss of 512MB ram shouldn't make a diff in the benchmarking, but if you are running cad apps and other 3d/rendering apps or video/photo editing software, u might notice the difference as the program might swap more... see if that helps you get the scores you want just my 2 cents |
I still believe that you're running about right. When I had a AMD XP 3000+ and 9800 Pro, I could only get around 18,000 on 3dmark2k1. The 9800 Pro makes your card cry, so I wouldn't expect too much more. If you want, it would make sence to start upgrading, maybe AMD 64, or new line video card....
|
nice input guys.. but I think hes long gone now :)
|
Wow, I didn't notice the date...
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.