![]() |
9800 pro rox my sox off!
|
that score was before i overclocked or even before i changed settings on my card. he he! w00t :)
|
haha nice man
|
and now you are convinced of the failure that the fx series is...
|
Quote:
|
the FX series wasn't a failure. You can't compare the 5500 with a 9800. They're just not ment to compete with one another
|
just about! the 5800 was supposed to compete directly against the 9800 pro.... the 5500 isn't even close.. and yes, it was a failure.. the 5200 is like a g2mx... the 5950 is like a 9800 pro.. almost.. :/
The biggest failure of the fx series was its main selling point... dx9 games... that's why it's a failure.. there are few that would disagree with that other than for the sake of the argument |
Quote:
|
stinky and uranium said what i wanted to say as well
lol FX isnt a failure although 9800Pro is a success but still that doesnt make 5900XT a failure |
Quote:
|
you guys need to wake up... the nv3x series has to play hl2 in dx8 or else it would be unplayable....
|
its very playable, i tried it, it just isnt as fast as dx9 cause of only 4 pipes
|
of course it's playable because it's in dx8 mode! If it did 9 it'd get ass-raped! go take a look at anandtech and they'll tell you all about it...
|
oh my god.. read please..
i was talking about dx9.. |
Quote:
|
yeah, i know what other people say, i dotn care cause i already tried it myself, all im saying is that i tried it with dx9 and got playable framerates (35-40) on all setting low
|
35-40 is a crock of crap and is barely playable.. they were considering over 60 tolerable... (That guy I bought the x800pro for refunded my $ because the card is broken sigh..)
|
i was sorta thinking that it was too good to be true...
|
I got a radeon 9800 pro and found that it was a lot better than the old fx 5800 that i had
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.