Now, now lads, don't misconstrue what I'm saying.
"Saddam" needs to be removed. "Saddam" is the evil SOB. But I do think we knew this from before the first invasion. So lets not forget that the general populace of Iraq qnd Kuwait got their collective butts kicked in the last conflict whilst "Saddam" sat back and smoked his cigars and barely said 'hmm". >
Nuking Iraq probably won't get rid of Saddam. We need to go in, get his ass, and shoot him. That kind of precision and approach would get a lot more respect and support across the board. Walloping the whole Iraqi population will only create another Arab/(put whoever you like here) conflict.
The last thing we need are suicide bombers in the subway in NY and TO.
Blasting the middle east will only create more martyrs and terrorists because we would be insensitive to fail to recognise that those people need liberating, not an ass kicking.
I'm pretty sure that they'll be real cooperative and "trade" friendly with Saddam out of the way.