9800 pro rox my sox off!

that score was before i overclocked or even before i changed settings on my card. he he! w00t

[StinkyMojo]

haha nice man

[Jason425]

and now you are convinced of the failure that the fx series is...

Originally Posted by Jason425

and now you are convinced of the failure that the fx series is...

Ok i admit now. my 5500 got 45 fps on Painkiller on 800 by 600 and medium details. I got 140-160 fps on those settings i set them up to 1024 by 768 and high. omg so much better looking at it stays at a solid 80 fps!

[Uranium-235]

the FX series wasn't a failure. You can't compare the 5500 with a 9800. They're just not ment to compete with one another

[Jason425]

just about! the 5800 was supposed to compete directly against the 9800 pro.... the 5500 isn't even close.. and yes, it was a failure.. the 5200 is like a g2mx... the 5950 is like a 9800 pro.. almost.. :/

The biggest failure of the fx series was its main selling point... dx9 games... that's why it's a failure.. there are few that would disagree with that other than for the sake of the argument

[StinkyMojo]

Originally Posted by Jason425

5950 is like a 9800 pro..

umm facts only please? a 5900XT is about equivalent to a 9800 pro. 5950 ultra can be compared to a 9800 xt

stinky and uranium said what i wanted to say as well
lol

FX isnt a failure

although 9800Pro is a success
but still that doesnt make 5900XT a failure

Originally Posted by eviltechie

stinky and uranium said what i wanted to say as well
lol

FX isnt a failure

although 9800Pro is a success
but still that doesnt make 5900XT a failure

saw the 5900 on action on MOH PA. ran ok. on my system MOH PA should run like great!