Ok- and that 'going from 56k->DSL->1Mbps DSL'..... right. I
have a 32MB DDR ATi card (Original ATi Radeon 32MB DDR Mac Edition PCI 166/166) and it's good for me

Oh, and btw, 1Mbps is 19.21x faster than 56k's theoretical potential (53.3kbps, due to it being neccessary to run at a low-enough frequency so as not to interrupt phone lines)- and a 9500 Pro is
not 19.2x faster- not even 10x faster. Maybe 3x faster?? (O.K., I'm just jealous because the GPU on ur video card is clocked higher than my computer's CPU) :P And internet connections<1Mbps are slow. I have 3Mbps cable
And what's this about "that's hardcore?" Let me tell you something: No, it isn't. 256MB DDR on a GF FX 5600 is worthless- just marketing by nVidia. Why? A 256MB frame buffer not only is unnecessary in todays games (yes, even Doom III at 1600x1200), and even if it
were helpful, a GeForce FX 5600 does
not have the neccessary horsepower to have it help any. Hardcore is more . . . you know, a VooDoo5 6000 rev. 3700A with mounted heatsinks and small taped vials of liquid nitrogen, lowering the quad VSA-100's ambient temp far below it's otherwise-160ºF state, and using this cooling to OC it to 210/210MHz- the 5.5ns SDRAM prevents furthur memory overclocking, and the card is already bandwidth starved [only 2.7GBps per chip@166MHz)- giving it a theoretical 1.68GigaPixel/s fillrate, effective 13.44GBps bandwidth, and ability to use 8x FSAA more playably.
THAT'S hardcore. (Well actually it'd be even more HC if u soldered some 4.5ns 230MHz DDR-RAM (running ofcourse as SDRAM on a 3dfx card) allowing you to raise the core clock of the VSA-100's to 230MHz (any higher probably wouldn't be possible due to the 0.25µ manufacturing process, and the imperfections inheritant of all CPU/GPU/RAM transistors).
I may get C's an' D's in school but i know that much....... sorta. :/