|
Memory Timings Analysis Review by Harry Lam
on 05.16.03 Introduction: The typical BIOS usually offers a varying number of settings directly related to memory: everything from timings to clock speeds. It's generally known that smaller and more aggressive timings combined with higher clock speeds leads to higher performance, but for the most part, the increase in performance from tweaking each individual setting is relatively unknown. Perhaps in a bit too ambitious move, I set out to examine the impact of each individual memory timing and clock speed on overall performance. The article that follows contains my experiences in this "memory benchmarking adventure" in conjunction with Crucial's PC2700 DDR RAM (and also gives a relatively good picture to the limits of this memory). I would recommend that anyone interested in learning more about memory timings take a look at this site. It gives a pretty good technical intro to memory timings. Testing/Methodology: Motherboard Selection: Benchmark: Depth: I established Memory Speed (100, 133, 166), CAS Latency (3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5), and Bank Interleave (Disabled, 2 Bank, 4 Bank) as the primary criterion for my benchmarking (as these usually are the settings that are most emphasized). The "less significant" memory timings (Trp, Tras, Trcd, DRAM Command Rate, DRAM Burst Length, Write Recovery Time, and DRAM Access Time) as a result received a less thorough testing. The general testing methodology is as follows: All combinations of Memory Speed, CAS Latency, and Bank Interleave were tested at the least aggressive memory timings, and once that was complete, I changed the first of the "less significant" memory timings to a more aggressive value (Trp was changed from 3T to 2T). I then repeated benchmarks for all possible combinations of CAS Latencies, and Bank Interleaves based on this new timing (12 total combinations). Once this was complete, I changed the value of the next "less significant" memory timing (Tras), and repeated another set of 12 combinations (keep in mind, I left Trp at 2T, the most "optimized" value). This process was repeated for each "less significant" memory timing, and then the entire set (of 96 different combinations) was repeated at an increased clock speed (for a total of 289 different combinations). As I stated earlier, this results in an uneven number of data points. For example Trp had 36 data points at 3T compared with 252 data points at 2T, and the reverse is true for DRAM Access time (252 to 36). Test RAM: Crucial was gracious enough to send me two 128MB sticks of their PC2700 solution to aid my testing. Crucial 128MB PC2700 DDR RAM: Part #CT1664Z355:
Note that I did not adjust the DRAM voltage at all on my motherboard, so the potential for more aggressive timings is present. Test Bench: Intel P4 2.4 Ghz, 400Mhz FSB, 512K L2 Cache CPU
|
|
:: Copyright © 2002-2008 Techware Labs, LLC :: All Rights Reserved |