Uh:
"Maximum 2D Resolution (at 32-bit color)
1600 x 1200
Maximum 3D Resolution (at 32-bit color)
2048 x 1536"
Is that true?
If so:
A. Why in the world would they only support a 2D (desktop) resolution up to 1600? 1600 is becoming moderately commonplace for people running 19" monitors and higher, which is a growing population. If you think about the audience who will be bying a GeForce FX, it's going to be the elite users, to boot. They're likely to have nice hardware (>19" mointors), and likely to run high resolutions. I find that either inaccurate, or absurd.
B. Why on earth would the 3D resolution be higher than 2D? I don't even feel the need to explain that one.
Regardless, eviltechie's comment about the price is the same as mine. I thought retail was going to be $499...but I haven't been following it that closely. Who knows.
I do know, however, that I'm considering getting one. My tax refund checks should be here by then...hehe.
|