Revolution, XBox360, or PS3?

[Dragon]

I dunno which one I like better... how bout you?

[StinkyMojo]

im really into the looks and features of the revy, so thats my number one.. the ps3 will be badass too.

[Aemon_]

<offtopic>
dang, i'm behind. the newest console i have is a PS, and thats in its box in the closet. the rest of my consoles follow (in decending order): Sega Saturn, Sega Genesis/SegaCD, and finally Atari 2600.

hmm, i guess i'm not a gamer.

later
</offtopic>

[Jason425]

lol aemon you're such a dork.. old ps and a 750 p3...

[Aemon_]

yeah, or i'm just content with what i have. i don't play that many games, why spend the money on a new console? my machine has enough power to do what i need it to do, why spend money uselessly? you don't need too killer of a machine to write html, php, and coldfusion.

anyway, i'm a bit above pissing contests. i have nothing to prove with my hardware.

later

[Jason425]

Well, if you want to go there, *starts pissing* I win!

[vee_ess]

PS3 is going to be the best, simply because of it's dual HDMI outputs.

[Jason425]

a system being the best because of a spec.. if that were the case, the xbox would have won this round, being easily the superior box of the three hardware wise

[vee_ess]

Are you kidding me? It's tied at best. The only thing MS's chief Xbox officer can criticise about the PS3 is that it's overkill. In terms of performance, the 360 has better memory bandwidth, but the PS3 has better raw processing power (framerates vs. realism). For reference, Guardian.co.uk has info.

[Jason425]

PS2 has 43% of the market share and xbox has like 27% and gamecube has like 13% and the rest is somewhere else.. I don't know if those were the exact numbers but they were close to that...

Hey, I know ps2 sucks, but it sold the most by far...


a 4000+ with onboard video isn't going to play good games...

the 360 has 3 3.2 ghz chips... give me a break...