Two things: the "about evga" thing is totally out of flow with the rest of the article, and I skipped right past it.
Secondly, if omitting overclocked benchmarks wasn't bad enough, the "assumption" that the Ati card would lose to the 512mb nvidia card is unacceptable and leaves the reader feeling as if they're missing out on information, and are forced to trust the OPINION OF THE MEDIA, when of course, the media is supposed to be impartial... right?
Oh, and one more thing... the review said that evga didn't have their logo on it, and then pointed to the fan. The logo is ON THE FAN!
Hey, at least I read it. That's more than most people do.
