Techware Labs Header
RSS
Home | Reviews | Articles | Downloads | Guides | Staff | Advertising | Links
Mainboards | Networking | Video | Cases | Storage | Other

DDR3 Week Round-Up


Author:  Jason Dumbaugh
Date:  2008.08.15
Topic:  Memory
Provider:  Kingston, Corsair, PQI, Super Talent, Patriot
Manufacturer:  Kingston, Corsair, PQI, Super Talent, Patriot






DDR3 Week Round-Up

DDR3 Week Roundup

SiSoft Sandra XII:

Cache and Memory:

Higher numbers are better.

Model:
Cache & Mem 1375
Cache & Mem 1600
Cache & Mem 1800
Kingston 1375
36.267
0
0
Corsair 1600
36.143
36.609
0
Kingston 1600
35.332
35.932
0
PQI 1600
35.828
36.406
0
Super Talent 1800
35.230
36.151
34.573
Patriot 1800
35.936
36.869
0

Cache and Memory

In a strange turn, we now see that the Kingston DDR3-1375 kit pulls into the lead, barely beating the Corsair kit. This is neat since the Kingston kit costs about half the price of the Corsair RAM. Corsair holds a close 2nd, followed by the Patriot set. Following the 1600 test, the Patriot set pulls into the lead, followed by the Corsair set then the PQI set.

 

Memory Bandwidth:

Higher numbers are better.

Model:
Bandwidth 1375
Bandwidth 1600
Bandwidth 1800
Kingston 1375
5860
0
0
Corsair 1600
5776
5877
0
Kingston 1600
5821
5896
0
PQI 1600
5776
5813
0
Super Talent 1800
5824
5924
4942
Patriot 1800
5789
5825
0

Memory Bandwidth

We also see here that the Kingston DDR3-1375 kit is in 1st. Super Talent barely beats out the Kingston DDR3-1600 kit by 3 points. Again, the price comparison makes this quite interesting, as there is about a $100 difference in the kits. As we move to the 1600 test, we now see the Super Talent kit pull into the lead, with the Kingston 1600MHz kit trailing a close 2nd.

 

Memory Latency:

Lower numbers are better.

Model:
Latency 1375
Latency 1600
Latency 1800
Kingston 1375
78
0
0
Corsair 1600
78
75
0
Kingston 1600
79
75
0
PQI 1600
78
78
0
Super Talent 1800
78
75
77
Patriot 1800
79
75
0

Memory Latency

The memory latency test offers a lot closer result values than the previous tests, but we also see that lower numbers are better. The Kingston DDR3-1375 kit, Corsair DDR3-1600 kit, PQI DDR3-1600 kit, and Super Talent DDR3-1800 kit seem to be in the lead on this one, though there is only a 1ms difference. Now that we move on to the 1600 test, we see that the PQI doesn't even move! The rest of the sets speed up, but strangely the PQI lagged. Normally we wouldn't comment on the 1800 test, but you'll notice the time actually got worse for the Super Talent kit while operating at 1800MHz.

 

Real Time Pricing:



« Performance Test 6.1
Conclusion »