|
Intel Q9650 3.00GHz Quad Core Processor
SiSoft Sandra:
Q9650 @ 1333MHz:
 |
 |
Multi-Core Efficiency |
|
This time, we compared our Q9650 @ 1333MHz to the previous 1333MHz recording of the Q6700, the SiSoft recording of the Intel Q6700, the Intel QX9650, and the Intel QX6850. We see from the pictures above that the Q6700 @ 1333 falls in 3rd with 17659MB/sec, a decent bit higher than our 16266MB/sec reading from the Q6700.
 |
 |
Processor Multimedia |
|
This time, we compared our Q9650 @ 1333MHz to the previous 1333MHz recording of the Q6700, the SiSoft recorded Intel Q6700, the Intel Q9450, and the Intel Q9550. As you can see from the scores above, The Q9650 @ 1333 comes in 1st this time, beating all of the competition.
 |
 |
Processor Arithmetic |
|
This time, we compared our Q9650 @ 1333MHz to the previous 1333MHz recording of the Q6700, the SiSoft recorded Intel Q6700, the Intel Q9450, and the Intel QX9650. We see that the Q9650 came in first again, even beating the QX9650.
 |
 |
Power Management |
|
We opted to use the ALU performance test with NTSC 30Hz frequency, and chose to compare our Q9650 @ 1333MHz to the previous 1333MHz recording of the Q6700, the Intel QX6850, the Intel QX9650, and the SiSoft recorded Intel Q6700. The Intel Q9650 ranked 3rd, being beaten by the QX6850 and a previously recorded value.
REALTIME PRICING