|
Intel Q9650 3.00GHz Quad Core Processor
SiSoft Sandra:
Q6700 @ 1333MHz:
 |
Multi-Core Efficiency |
This time, we chose to compare our Q6700 @ 1333MHz to the previous 1066MHz recording, the Intel QX6850, the Intel QX9650, and the Intel E6700. We see from the pictures above that the Q6700 @ 1333 falls in 3rd with 16266MB/sec, just a bit higher than our 16184MB/sec reading while the processor was at 1066.
 |
 |
Processor Multimedia |
|
This time, we chose to compare our Q6700 @ 1333MHz to the previous 1066MHz recording, the SiSoft recorded Intel Q6700, the Intel Q9450, and the AMD Phenom 9900. As you can see from the scores above, The Q6700 @ 1333 comes in 4th this time, being beaten by the Intel Q9450, and (strangely) the previously recorded 1066MHz vales. The AMD Phenom was trumped quite easily, even by the Q6600.
 |
 |
Processor Arithmetic |
|
This time, we chose to compare our Q6700 @ 1333MHz to the previous 1066MHz recording, as well as the other processors tested above. We see that the Q6700 is beaten again by the Intel Q9450, and the previously recorded 1066MHz vales, ranking in 4th place. Again, the AMD Phenom 9900 comes in last.
 |
 |
Power Management |
|
We opted to use the ALU performance test with NTSC 30Hz frequency, and chose to compare our Q6700 @ 1333MHz to the previous 1066MHz recording, against the Intel QX6850, the Intel QX9650, and the SiSoft recorded Intel Q6700. Somehow, our previous 1066 recordings beat out all of the competition, leaving the Q6700 @ 1333 in 4th place to the QX6850 and SiSoft recorded Q6700.
REALTIME PRICING