Techware Labs Header
RSS
Home | Reviews | Articles | Downloads | Guides | Staff | Advertising | Links
Mainboards | Networking | Video | Cases | Storage | Other

HighPoint RocketRAID 2640X4


Author:  Michael Bosse
Date:  2008.09.08
Topic:  Storage
Provider:  HighPoint
Manufacturer:  HighPoint






HighPoint RocketRAID 2640X4

HighPoint Company Logo

Testing

4x Fujitsu 15k SAS

After formatting, the four Fujitsu 15k SAS drive RAID5 array is 205 GB.

CrystalDiskmark shows that configuring these disks in a RAID5 array doesn't touch the sequential read and write performance one bit. Compare the top two numbers to those on the previous page to see what I mean. Notice how the (previously very high) random access speeds take a hit due to the how the RAID5 array works. They drop to only about 10% of what they were. RAID5 is good for storage and data security but bad for gaming :)

In the DataMarck test, the RAID5 configuration didn't touch the mean seek time which remains a blazingly fast 4.4ms. Remember that when selecting storage technology for gaming, seek time is one of the most important factors. More on this later!

HD Tune once again points out how consistent this configuration is when it comes to read speeds. The array checks in at just under 30MB/s slower than the RAID0 configuration. Still, 130MB/s is nothing to scoff at! Notice how the seek time is still very low here (6.9ms).

During the Sandra read test, with the array configured in a RAID5, the read performance isn't quite what it was before, dropping from the amazing 170MB/s to a meagre 130MB/s. However, the array is still blowing away the competition. Look at how flat that red line is; the performance on this thing is rock solid!

In the Sandra write test we see a decline in the write performance as compared to the RAID0 configuration, but you can see that it is still hands down the best of the bunch.

REALTIME PRICING



« Testing - 4x Fujitsu 15k SAS - RAID0/RAID5
Testing, Our Suggestions, and Conclusion »