Techware Labs Header
RSS
Home | Reviews | Articles | Downloads | Guides | Staff | Advertising | Links
Mainboards | Networking | Video | Cases | Storage | Other

DDR3 Week Round-Up


Author:  Jason Dumbaugh
Date:  2008.08.15
Topic:  Memory
Provider:  Kingston, Corsair, PQI, Super Talent, Patriot
Manufacturer:  Kingston, Corsair, PQI, Super Talent, Patriot






DDR3 Week Round-Up

DDR3 Week Roundup

Test Rig:

All of the RAM sets were tested on the same computer, with the parts listed below:

 

CPU-Z:

CPU-Z isn't exactly a benchmark, so there's really no "who's better than the other" here. Below, we've posted the CPU-Z images for all 6 products for each frequency. Refer to the individual product reviews if something you see doesn't make sense.

Kingston
1375
Corsair
1600
Kingston
1600
PQI
1600
Super Talent
1800
Patriot
1800
 
         

 

MemTach:

Higher numbers are better.

Model: memset 1375 memcpy 1375 memset 1600 memcpy 1600 memset 1800 memcpy 1800
Kingston 1375
2351.4
1872.9
0
0
0
0
Corsair 1600
2410.6
1928.4
2443.3
1938.5
0
0
Kingston 1600
2403.2
1866.3
2469
1926.2
0
0
PQI 1600
2413.6
1902.1
2296.8
1875
0
0
Super Talent 1800
2360.5
1878.4
2429.3
1910.9
2344.2
1798.7
Patriot 1800
2402.3
1924.8
2452
1934.3
0
0

memset
memcpy
memset
memcpy

As you can see from the graphs above, the PQI RAM seems to lead in the memset 1375 test, but drops to the bottom for the memset 1600 test (since the Kingston 1375 can't be tested at that frequency). The leader in memset 1600 becomes the Kingston DDR3-1600 kit. Memcpy 1375 starts with a nice lead from the Corsair DDR3-1600 kit, and stays strong through the memcpy 1600 test as well. We notice in the 1800MHz test that the Super Talent RAM has a severe drop in performance, even below the 1375 test. Our Patriot kit wouldn't operate at a FSB of 1066, so the results were not included to be fair.

 

Real Time Pricing:



« Introduction
Performance Test 6.1 »