With the question of overclocking out of the way, it was time to run some benchmarks and see how things shook out.
With the overall score, the FX-8350 shows about an 8% increase over the FX-8150. I was sort of hoping for more here, but as you can see with the relatively simple low-risk overclock was about a 13% improvement. This was at least closer to my expectations, and it’s at least good to know that the additional performance is there if you’re willing (and capable).
The remaining individual suites seemed to mirror the overall in both percentages and trend, so at minimum the performance gains were consistent in the various benchmarks.
Related
[…] Processors: — AMD FX-8350 4.00 GHz Eight-Core […]
[…] AMD FX-8350 “Piledriver” Processor Review @ TechwareLabs […]
[…] @ Legit Reviews @ OCC @ OCInside @ PCPer @ Phoronix @ Technic3D @ TechPowerUp @ TechSpot @ TechwareLabs […]
[…] AMD FX-8350 “Piledriver” Processor Review @ TechwareLabs […]
[…] AMD FX-8350 “Piledriver” Processor Review @ TechwareLabs […]
[…] AMD FX-8350 “Piledriver” Processor Review @ TechwareLabs […]
[…] AMD FX-8350 “Piledriver” Processor Review @ TechwareLabs […]
[…] KitOverClocked Inside explores the CM Storm Scout 2 CaseTechwareLabs spends some time with the AMD FX-8350 Piledriver ProcessorBCC Hardware gets into the Giada A51 (AMD) Mini PCPhoronix checks out FX-8350 Piledriver Tuning On […]