AMD FX-8350 “Piledriver” Processor Review

Conclusion:

The FX-8350 is closer to what the FX-8150 should have been. There, I said it, and I think that pretty much sums up the comparison…so if you stop reading right now, you at least have the right take away. The CPU performs better in almost all facets, runs more efficiently (processing versus temps versus power usage), and overclocks extremely well (even on air). Investing into a new cooling solution, could yield a really nice return on your investment.

Additionally, where AMD is getting it right again, is with pricing. The FX-8350 specifically will be priced lower than many of “locked” i5 Intel variants, which increases the incentive to pick one up.

Does all of this add up to a must buy? I think the answer will ultimately lie in what you want out of a CPU and the particulars (cost, configuration, usage, and preference). However, I will say that AMD has positioned themselves much better this go around and there are more reasons to buy an FX-8350 then there was an FX-8150. I applaud AMD for the hard work they have put into giving the FX-series some of the love it was missing.  However, the FX-Series is still not the FX series of old, and users will still have to weigh the decision of going with the new FX-Series versus an Intel solution, as the new FX-series doesn’t make it a no-brainer.

Pro’s:

• Cost Attractive
• Unlocked versus its comparable Intel counterparts
• Great multi-threading performance
• Excellent overclocking capabilities
• AM3+ compatible

Con’s:

• Single-threaded performance still lacking over some Intel solutions
• Doesn’t dominate the competition, leaving it’s value subject to configuration and usage variables

TechwareLabs Silver Award

  Previous Page         1. Overview2. Closer Look3. Hardware Setup and Overclocking4. PCMark 75. SiSoftware Sandra 20126. x264 HD and CINEBENCH7. Gaming Benchmarks8. Conclusion9. View All         Next Page